|
Warp 6
From the Publisher...
Guide your fleet of spaceships down the spiral path before your opponents get there first.
Your fleet is composed of four-, six- and eight-sided dice. A die moves as far as the number indicated on its face, but gets rerolled whenever it warps down a level by landing on another ship. If you can manage to warp down six levels, you'll reach the end in no time.
A madcap, abstract-strategy race game.
Customer Raves - Write your own Rave about this game!
(Click on a person's name or game group to see other raves by the same person or group.
Interview...
The three guys from Pair-of-Dice Games, Greg Lam, Luke Weisman
and Brian Tivol, were among the first to enter their game into
the Independent Designer Program here at Fair Play. Warp 6
fit perfectly with my original intent for the IDP. It was a self-published
game done inexpensively, but with style.
As it turns out, though, the guys needed no help from Fair
Play getting exposure for their game. Shortly after adding to the
site, we got news that the game, along with another from Pair-of-Dice,
was selected by GAMES Magazine for their Games 100. As has been
my custom now, I asked the guys if they'd be willing to answer
some questions for us to include with our IDP Feature. I think
their responses will prove useful to anyone else seeking to
publish their own games.
Mike Petty: Let's start with what each of you do for a
living.
Brian: I'm a software engineer.
Greg: You mean you don't think we're making a living with game
design alone?!? I do freelance graphic design and also
administrative work for non-profits.
Luke: I teach math and computer science at a small private
highschool.
MP: That's exactly what I'm teaching this year. Do you
ever do any gaming with your students?
Luke: Yup, as much as possible. We have two all-school
retreats every year and I bring a big sack of games and try to
convert the masses. I believe strongly that thinking about games,
i.e. actively using your brain, helps you in the long run.
Sometimes the kids play my games. One of them buys my games and I
always feel like some kind of slime drug-dealer when he hands me
cash and I hand overproduct during school hours.
MP: I can relate to that! I've made a few Fair Play sales
at school myself.
So, how and when did Pair-of-Dice games get started?
Luke: I started inventing games, and then somewhere along
there some other folks started inventing them as well. The main
game I was testing, Prospectors Scramble, was fairly
heavyweight and my thoughts of publishing were curtailed by the
size of the thing. Around that time I invented the Triangle
Game one Saturday morning because I was frustrated by the
lack of three-player games on my shelf. When I showed the
prototype to folks they got really enthusiastic and so I decided
to try and make that one. I shopped around and cobbled together a
design, talked to folks, and ended up making 100 copies. Greg was
inventing games at this time and there was talk of doing stuff
together. This is when I registered Pair-of-Dice Games.
Then Greg came out with Knockabout and everyone
flipped over it, so we decided to do it. Brian said he wanted it
out there, and that he wanted a copy, and that he would front
money, and that got the three of us rolling. We then collectively
invented Warp 6, threw in some other games while we were
at it, and ended up with our first line of five.
Greg: We put that first line of games out there in December
2001.
Brian: Every once in a while, I'd hear about Luke's progress
selling the Triangle Game. I must not have been
listening, really, since I had the impression that making and
selling games would be unbridled fun. When he broke even on his
first investment, I asked if he'd be up for manufacturing another
round of some different games.
MP: And a year later, two of your games make the Games 100.
Congratulations!
Brian: Thanks!
MP: I'm interested in how the idea for Warp 6, the pick
for best abstract strategy, first came about.
Brian: We knew that, for Knockabout, we'd be buying a
lot of polyhedral dice, so we tried to make a different game that
used the same pieces. We all sat in my kitchen, throwing out
ideas -- Greg traced a spiral on a Knockabout board,
suggesting a race game, and the three of us started to figure out
how to move pieces around.
Luke: We were sitting around trying to figure out how to make Knockabout
a good 3-player game. We got frustrated and started brainstorming
games with the Knockabout board and dice. We piled ideas
on each other and somehow ended up with Warp 6.
Greg: That's the secret about the Warp 6 board. It's
really the Knockabout board in disguise. You move the
dice around the perimeter, then warp inward if you land on a die.
It really amused us in the GAMES Magazine reviews that they
counted the number of spaces on the boards. It never occured to
us to do that.
MP: Now, the rules to Warp 6 are very simple, which is
great. But how did all three of you manage to work out a game
with so few rules? How did each of you contribute?
Greg: This game is unique for us in that we all were there
when it was created. Looking back on it, it's hard to remember
who came up with what, but we had been playing around with the
mechanic of having dice which are your pawns as well as being the
random number generators. That mechanic is common among Knockabout,
Pagoda, and Warp 6 in various forms. So Warp
6 came about as a result of playing around with that idea.
After that initial meeting, in which we laid out the basic game,
I went and played around with the spiral idea to better describe
the playing surface, rather than having a hexagonal board with
little arrows all over the place. That would have been too busy,
especially when we're only printing with one color on the board.
Brian: Brainstorming in my kitchen, we wound up with a game
that's very close to Warp 6 now. Both games only have
about six things to describe in their rulesets (the board, the
initial set-up, movement, the ability to alter a die, the victory
condition, and the name), and we each contributed two to the
kitchen game. Through playtesting, we tweaked some of the parts
of the game (especially the name), and our individual rules were
modified or replaced by others. I'm sure we can't cut up today's
ruleset into equal thirds, but it started as a group effort and
we were too lazy to change the attribution.
Greg: For some reason, they weren't crazy about "Downward
Spiral" or "Down the Drain" as a game title. You
get into a lot of odd discussions when designing a game. Like is
that spiral going uphill or downhill, towards you or away from
you?
Luke: It was all a muddle, but in general we kept looking to
cull rules that did not contribute. I think that often a single,
simple, novel idea can create a rich world of strategy.
MP: Greg, you said Warp 6 was unique. It doesn't fit your
usual design process?
Greg: No, Warp 6 is unusual. Every other game we've
worked on, one of us has come up with the idea, then brought it
in to play test. Warp 6 just sort of happened. It's
actually fairly hard to get the three of us together.
Brian: I'm notoriously bad for saying, "Here's a board
with a neat mechanism for moving parts around. Now, what should
they do?" We spend a lot of time tweaking, playtesting and
helping each other, but, for the most part, each idea has one
inventor who cultivates it.
MP: How do you test your games, and what sort of reaction
do you look for from your testers when you try out a game like
Warp 6?
Greg: Comprehension. I look to see if they get it, if they're
interested in the process, if they're having fun with it. Or if
they're looking around in space when it's not their turn. That's
happened as well with other games. We just try and get various
people to play it.
Luke: We play them, we force our friends to play them, and
then we make arbitrary judgements.
Brian: It's good to hear "I want to play that game again".
Normally, when a player says that about any game, they're
interested in feeling out a new strategy or a different angle on
the game, and those are the kind of games we hoped to make. When
we hear that comment from our friends we've strongarmed into
playing, it's even better -- after fulfilling their obligation to
us as friends, they'd actually play the game again without our
bullying.
Greg: I don't know about Luke and Brian, but I'll often play
games solo when I'm alone, taking both sides to see if anything
interesting happens.
MP: When you guys aren't working on your own designs, what
sort of games do you play?
Luke: Board games of all sorts, role-playing games, party
games. These days I love things like Princes of Florence,
Die Pyramiden des Jaguars, or Go.
Brian: I like games that force you to plan to make the best of
randomness, so I've been playing a lot of German card games
recently: Battle Line, Foppen, and Sticheln.
I also like games where you can tweak an opponent without having
to sacrifice your own goals. Both Die Pyramiden des Jaguars
and San Marco have a nifty "I split you choose"
card mechanism, so I've been enjoying those lately.
Greg: There's a weekly game playing session on Mondays that we
go to with a number of gamers who have a pipeline to the most
recent stuff. I just go and play what's there. Really, there are
friends of ours who have a lot more information about the depth
of games out there than I do, not to mention a better collection
of games. So I just go there and play what's being played.
MP: What things can we expect from Pair-of-Dice Games in
the future?
Luke: We are working on a few games, all of a different feel
than our previous ones. We are toying with more themed games, for
example.
Greg: We're also doing some marketing on our games. I got a
response from a guy which was a manifesto on why themed games
were so much more appealing than abstract strategy games. I was
like, "Man, we have nothing against themed games. We just
don't have 8 shades of pastel plastic camels on hand."
We're in the process of doing another printing of Warp 6
and Knockabout, the other game that got into the GAMES
100, since that was an unexpected boost in general visibility.
Basically, we're trying to establish ourselves and stay the
course. Getting into the GAMES 100 was a great, unexpected thing.
We never thought that'd be possible so we didn't stop to think
what that would mean. Now we have to figure out the manufacturing
process. All of the games we sell in tubes--Knockabout, Warp
6, and Pagoda--involve two components: A board and
dice. That's because we didn't know how to make cards, tokens,
and pieces on any sort of scale cheaply. If we figure out those
processes, then we will probably come out with different types of
games.
Brian: We have a few games in the works that we hope to have
ready during the spring. We're branching out, too, looking at die-cutters,
cloth bags and cardboard.
MP: So I take it your games are produced largely by hand?
Greg: Yes, we get cloth for the boards from fabric stores.
Then we take the cloth to a place to get cut into squares, take
it to another place to get silkscreened, and then pack it into
tubes along with the dice. We can do this since we only make 100
or so at a time. If we get more exposure and higher volumes, we
may have to switch to a production company, but that's all in the
future.
MP: I get a lot of e-mail and comments about our
Independent Designers Program. People toying with game design on
the side tell me they hope to submit their own games someday. As
a final question, do you guys have any advice for hopeful
designers in getting that first game design out there without
going broke?
Luke: It is both amazing what a small-print run can cost, and
how cheap it is. We have been cautious all the way through, never
exposing ourselves for much of a loss. This has also made us less
likely to spread like wildfire, but it seems to be working. I'd
advise simple component games, obviously! Keep things simple. The
main piece of advice I wish I had followed more is being willing
to spend a bit more up front making prototypes and getting random
parts. Be patient and rework the physical design as much as
possible. There are things in our games that I would change now,
that wouldn't have cost us more to produce. For example, our tube
size has never been quite perfect. Labels were an issue (entirely
my fault, sadly). So be patient and explore all possible ideas.
Greg: Our initial print of the three tube games (Knockabout,
Warp 6, and Pagoda) cost around $2,000 to make
300 games. Start small, keep realistic, don't expect things to
happen too quickly. You can do it yourself for a while if you
design games within the set of materials you could realistically
assemble in mass quantities. Have a large number of people you
play games with. Go play all sorts of games with frequent gamers
and make sure they like your game before you try to manufacture
it. They will probably be your audience. Join
boardgamedesign@yahoogroups.com.
There's a saying that popped up on a screensaver I had once:
"Good, Fast, Cheap. Choose any two." It's kind of true.
If you have a lot of money from your day job you could go
directly to a game printing company (they do exist) and make 1,000
professional-looking copies rather than 100 handmade ones. But
how do you sell 1,000 games and keep them from languishing in
your basement? There are inputs of time, money, and effort you
have to make in order to manufacture and sell.
MP: Sounds like a lot of good advice. Thank you for the tips
and the chance to ask you guys some questions. I hope Pair-of-Dice
enjoys even more success in 2003.
Greg: Thanks much. We appreciate this chance to talk.
Warp 6, along with all the other games in the IDP, is
on sale for 10% off during this time.
Congratulations to Pair-of-Dice Games! Warp 6 was the runner up for the Games 100 "Abstract Strategy" category in Games Magazine.
Here's a review of Warp6 by Peter Loop, a gamer from Oregon.
Warp6 at a Glance:
Rules Complexity: Simple  Complex
"One page rules, with clear illustrations, but the rule
that the a die is not rerolled after normal movement
isn't explicit and should be. "
Luck/Skill: Luck  Skill
"Dice are rolled, but more to set up the situation then
the dominating factor."
Game play: Lots of laughs  Lots of
thought
"A light brain burner."
Overall rating: Poor  Outstanding
"I would buy it at list price."
What type of players will like this game?
Backgammon players would enjoy this game. It is a race game
like Hare and Tortoise, but without a theme. The benefits of your
move must be balanced by how much it helps your opponent. Also
it's a puzzler like Ricochet Robot waiting to be unlocked in the
minimum amount of moves. This is not your themed German style of
game.
The review:
Introduction
This is a game from Pair-of-dice games, Greg Lam, Luke Wiesman
& Brain Tivol are listed as the designers. The playing
surface is printed green felt. The playing pieces are a bunch of
4, 6 & 8 sided dice in three colors. All this is packaged
with a rules sheet in a cardboard tube. It is one of three
similarly packaged games the others being Knockabout and Pagoda.
I just saw this game placed runner up in the Games 100 abstract
games category. I don't know if the category is right, but it is
a fun, fast playing game that requires you to think several moves
ahead. It also requires you to change plans quickly as
opportunity present itself. It is a good game!
Game overview
There is a throw away theme about starships battling from
warring worlds, which is best ignored. The game board is a seven
layered spiral with 127 spaces from start to end. Every space has
a two paths that can be followed. The long way which would take
up to 127 moves to complete, and a "warp" which moves a
piece in one or more layers on the spiral.
In a 3 player game each player has six dice (3D4, 2D6, 1D8) in
the two-player game each play has nine dice (4D4, 3D6, 2D8). More
could play but the equipment is not provided with the game. The
initial copies of Warp 6 did not provide enough dice for two
players, this issue has been corrected. A low cost upgrade is
available from the publisher and all future copies of the game
will be shipped with enough dice for both the two- and three-
player versions.
The key to the game is the warp move, which happens when you
end your move on occupied space. A warp moves your piece in one
layer on the spiral, avoiding up to 37 spaces, if that space is
also occupied you continute to move inward until you end on an
unoccupied space. But this may set up your opponent to make an
even deeper warp, jumping the piece you just played.
Although this is a game full of dice, its not a game of luck.
Dice are only rolled to start the game and at the end of a warp.
You do not go into each turn hoping for a good roll. You must
look at the landscape presented and find where to maximize your
opportunities, while minimizing your opponents'.
Brief Summary of Rules
To setup the game all players roll all their dice. Players
take turns in order (determined by a separate dice roll). Each
player places a die of their choosing in the furthest open space.
This continues until all die are placed.
For each turn a player must select one of three options:
- Normal movement: Move a die the full value shown on the
die. This movement must end on an empty space and the die
is not rerolled.
- Warping: The die is moved its full value but must end on
a occupied space, it doesn't matter who occupies the
space. Two die cannot occupy the same space, so the die
follows the warp path inward until it can land on an
unoccupied space. This is the fasts way to move around
the board. At the end of warp movement the die is
rerolled to a new movement value.
- Adjust a die's value: The movement value of the dice and
be adjusted up or down one pip. Which is very usefully
for setting up the big warp.
The game is won by the first player to advance/bear off 4 of
their dice to the center the spiral.
Game experiences
We completed the games in about 20 minutes, but we found we
took longer the more we played, as we thought more about each
move. The rules are simple enough for a 9-year old to pick up,
but there is some depth to play. This really is a puzzle. The
obvious move is not always the best. Warping will occur on the
majority of the moves, and it gets very difficult in the end game
to do something that will not present an opportunity to your
opponent. But the satisfaction from a good move is very high, as
is the "play it again" factor.
Conclusion
This is a good filler game. The Strategy/German gamer will
shun it for lack of theme. The pure abstract gamer will shudder
at the use of dice, but both groups will be missing out on a good
game. I'm happy to add it to my game collection.
|
